Championing accountability of the Criminal Justice System
How we operate
At Campion Legal, before advising you, we examine your matter and present you with the solutions and probable outcomes. We will not sugar coat the reality of the situation. You will hear how it is.
We will be able to inform you of your options, whether or not a plea of guilty or a plea of not guilty is advisable, depending on each individual circumstance.
We will challenge prosecutions as to the validity of their charges against you, examining the charges, seek errors, call them out, negotiate when necessary to reduce charges, and we will thoroughly test evidence of accusations against you.
We confidently present your matter by both oral submissions and also with written submissions handed up to the Court, citing relevant case law pertinent to your matter and circumstances.
We confidently stand by our submissions to the Court as our criminal law knowledge and expertise enables us to encounter any objections or scrutiny from the Bench and from prosecutions.
Our knowledgeable and expert presentation to the Court assist in obtaining the best possible outcome which may include matters being dismissed, or a non-conviction on a conditional release order, or just receiving the minimal fine.
Jean-Remi has proven track record due to his success in criminal law across different jurisdictions in Australia (QLD, NSW, VIC , SA, WA) in Local, Magistrate and District Court, including appeals.
Such experience gives him the edge in knowing what the Court expects to hear and how it should be presented. That is the Campion Legal advantage!
Campion Legal, focusing on providing a quality over quantity criminal legal service
What is the Campion Legal Advantage
Campion Legal is built upon the belief that prosecuting authorities need to be held accountable in the way they operate and that everyone has the right to social justice through affordable quality legal representation.
Jean-Remi will ensure that any charges the prosecutions are pressing, are substantiated.
The often-forgotten rule of law is that the prosecutions who have the onus of proving beyond reasonable doubt, the guilt of the accused. Until the Court accepts that onus is met, then you benefit from the presumption of innocence.
​
